Accessibility audit report (Standard)
Your website has notable defects, some of which are automatically detectable. We recommend addressing them soon.
Overview
| Pages checked | 3 |
|---|---|
| WCAG criteria checked automatically | 41 – of which 38 with no findings |
| Automatically detectable defects | 3 (2 high · 1 medium · 0 low) |
| Affected elements (automatic) | 7 |
| Additionally requiring manual review | 1 item(s) · 9 elements |
| Automated score | 60 / 100 |
Your website has notable defects, some of which are automatically detectable. We recommend addressing them soon. The score reflects only the automatically confirmed defects. A further 1 item(s) totalling 9 elements still require manual review and are not included here – they may change the result.
A selection of the most important pages of your website was checked. All statements and the score refer to this checked scope.
Technical initial assessment to WCAG 2.2 A/AA – not legal advice, not a proof of conformance. Full notice at the end.
Defects found – ordered by priority
Implementation note: each item states the problem, the number of affected elements and the pages involved, the standard fix and a before/after code example. The technical rule ID (axe-core) links to the detailed documentation; the remediation effort is per element. Every individual location – with selector, page, measured finding and a status to tick off – is in the attached working document GLC-Fundstellen.csv.
Images without alternative text
High priorityThe problem: Product images do not have descriptive text. Blind and visually impaired customers using a screen reader cannot see what is in the image.
<img src="produkt.jpg"><img src="produkt.jpg" alt="Blaue Trinkflasche, 750 ml">Rule reference (axe-core): image-alt
Links without meaningful text
High priorityThe problem: Links have only generic text such as 'Here', 'Click me' or 'More'. Users with screen readers or motor impairments do not understand where the link leads or cannot select it precisely.
<a href="/de"><img src="flagge.png"></a><a href="/de" aria-label="Deutsche Version">
<img src="flagge.png" alt="Deutsch">
</a>Rule reference (axe-core): link-name
Headings in wrong order
Medium priorityThe problem: Headings skip levels (e.g. H1 directly to H3). Screen reader users do not understand the structure and cannot navigate efficiently. The page appears disorganised.
<h1>…</h1>
<h4>…</h4><h1>…</h1>
<h2>…</h2>Rule reference (axe-core): heading-order
Manual review – for a complete assessment
These items cannot be conclusively determined by automatic testing (e.g. contrast over images, meaning of link text). They are part of a complete WCAG assessment and should be reviewed by a person.
Insufficient colour contrast
manual reviewThe problem: Text and background do not have enough contrast distance. People with visual impairments or colour blindness find text difficult or impossible to read, especially on mobile devices in bright environments.
<p style="color:#999;background:#fff">Text</p><p style="color:#595959;background:#fff">Text</p>Rule reference (axe-core): color-contrast
Recommended approach
1. First remedy all items with high priority – these are automatically detectable.
2. Plan items with medium and low priority within the next 4–8 weeks.
3. After remediation, have it re-checked – every update to your shop can introduce new defects. On request, our optional monitoring subscription handles this automatically.